• Meet Dr. Robotti
  • Papers
  • Gallery
  • Focus Rhinoplasty
  • Academy
Menu
Contacts
  • EN
    • IT
    • EN
Secondary

This patient previously underwent a closed rhinoplasty. In the photographs, the absence of aesthetic lines of the dorsum is evident, as well as an amorphous, downward-tending tip. On palpation—less apparent in the photos—there is a clear irregularity of the dorsum resulting from rasping of the dorsal hump. Clinical examination also reveals left-sided breathing impairment, later confirmed on CT by a residual deviation (left unaddressed during the initial operation).

In this young patient, who has high expectations and naturally harmonious facial proportions, the goal of secondary rhinoplasty is to restore proper aesthetic lines in the frontal view and achieve a well-projected, more refined tip relative to the dorsum. This requires precise restructuring of both the dorsum and the tip. Because the septum is completely intact (although deviated), septoplasty allows for both correction of the deviation—and therefore improvement in nasal breathing—and harvesting of the cartilage grafts needed for the dorsum and especially for the tip.

At 12 months postoperatively, the aesthetic lines have been restored and the tip is well defined. Functional issues have been corrected.
The tip has been triangularized. It appears less voluminous and thick both because it was carefully “defatted” surgically, with full respect for vascular supply, and because it was restructured using grafts placed at the nasal alae, harvested from the septum.
In the three-quarter views, correct nasal proportions are confirmed. It is noteworthy that, preoperatively, only the left three-quarter view was reasonably acceptable. It is therefore evident that proper evaluation of rhinoplasty outcomes must include pre- and postoperative comparison of both three-quarter views.
The dorsum height is appropriate, and the supratip break (the difference in projection between the tip and the dorsum line) is adequate.
The dorsum height is appropriate, and the supratip break (the difference in projection between the tip and the dorsum line) is adequate.
In the three-quarter views, correct nasal proportions are confirmed. It is noteworthy that, preoperatively, only the left three-quarter view was reasonably acceptable. It is therefore evident that proper evaluation of rhinoplasty outcomes must include pre- and postoperative comparison of both three-quarter views.
Cone beam CT, particularly suited for rhinoseptoplasty, allows precise localization of the deviation or deviations in all three projections: coronal, axial, and sagittal.
Menu
  • Home
  • Meet Dr. Robotti
  • Papers
  • Gallery
© 2026 Enrico Robotti
P.IVA 03955080167

Privacy Policy
Cookie Policy

Design by Elidria
  • Home
  • Meet Dr. Robotti
  • Papers
  • Gallery
  • Focus Rhinoplasty
  • Robotti Rhinoplasty Academy
Contacts
xgriparrow-right4chevron-down5instagram3